BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:-//WordPress - MECv6.3.0//EN
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://cerec.be/
X-WR-CALNAME:Cerec
X-WR-CALDESC:Center for Research in Economics
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20221125T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Brussels:20221125T130000
DTSTAMP:20221007T091400
UID:MEC-d4c2e4a3297fe25a71d030b67eb83bfc@cerec.be
CREATED:20221007
LAST-MODIFIED:20221007
PRIORITY:5
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SUMMARY:Eben seminar : “the view from the practitioners”
DESCRIPTION:ROOM : P02\nESG: the view from the practitioners”\n09.00-09.30:      Eubelius: Setting the scene: ESG: myth or reality?\n09.30-10.00:      Nike:  The Nike sustainability program\n10.00-10.30:      Break\n10.30-11.30:      Panel: Brigdestone, Group Herstal, Eubelius:\n\n\n\n\n\n– Governance questions when setting up an ESG programme/structure\n– Hurdles in the implementation of an ESG program + view on the recent provocative The Economist piece  (. ESG should be boiled down to one simple measure: emissions | The Economist ( https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/07/21/esg-should-be-boiled-down-to-one-simple-measure-emissions?utm_medium=social-media.content.np&utm_source=linkedin&utm_campaign=editorial-social&utm_content=discovery.content )   + In defence of ESG: A response to The Economist | Responsible Investor (responsible-investor.com) ( https://www.responsible-investor.com/in-defence-of-esg-a-response-to-the-economist/ ))\n– The crystal ball: future evolution in the ESG landscape\n\n\n\n\n\n11.30-12.30:      Legal and economics standpoint on ESG\n\n\n\n\n\nTBC: ESG litigations: where do we stand?\nCandriam: Impact of ESG efforts on the bottom line of companies. »\n\n\n\n\n\n
URL:https://cerec.be/events/johanesstroebel-148-479-812/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cerec.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/avril-2019-1.jpeg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR